SABIC set to construct the first renewable power chemical factory in the world

LONDON: SABIC set to build a chemical factory in Spain, and the plant will be powered by renewable energy. 

The Cartegena-situated plant will be ready and start to carry out its functions in 2024. 

The contract will contact Iberdrola, the most significant electricity entity globally, about investing €70 million. The investment will cater for the installation of 263,000 solar panels on a Sabic-owned soil. 

The contract has existed for the last twenty-five years. It is a manifestation of petrochemical ambitions of having 4Gw energy of either wind or solar energy fitted in its regions by 2025. 

In 2019, the entity fitted solar panels on its area that are situated in India and Thailand. Those solar installations have helped to decrease carbon emissions by 200 tons. 

Bob Maughon, EVP Sustainability, Technology, and Innovation asserted that having such useful contracts enable growth and expansion of various businesses. Maughan added that the success experienced in the previous years has been as a result of such dealerships. 

Soon after the facility, which is powered by electricity, comes to light, consumers who are both in building and automotive divisions will have the freedom to access all polycarbonate solutions produced by the 100% renewable energy. 

Apart from constructing a renewable power factory, the next on the list of SABIC is the installation of Photovoltaic (PV) technology at its working centers in Riyadh. 

Once everything is done, SABIC will take the produced electricity and then convey it to local factories of manufacturing chemicals. 

SABIC manufactures plastics, chemicals, and agricultural nutrients across the world. SABIC has employed over 33k people. 


Last year was another year of transformation for petrochemicals confining to the overall international transformation process of SABIC. 

Its productions have been of great importance. For instance, 

1. Facilitating efficiency and production as sustainability commitment gets bolstered. 

2. Formulation of new regulations that enhance performance and flexibility to consumers.

3. Enabling consumers to develop unique and exceptional commodities they endorse

End products from various contracts serve as a testimony to the common benefit of the thriving commercial alliances. The products have met all the recommended standards to meet the taste of the consumer. 

Whatever the end product is, the type of invention, business partners, and stock, the firm always makes sure that their products meet the ever-increasing needs of the world. The firm also attempts to meet small circular solutions that help reduce any impacts on the environment. 


Various domestic charging solutions for electric vehicle (EV) owners

The coronavirus outbreak has facilitated the global recognition of electric vehicles. The enhanced air quality due to low traffic has compelled people to believe in the transition to zero-emissions transportation by going electric. This statement comes after a comprehensive study by Venson Automotive Solutions into this transport system. 

The study conducted an interview where almost 20% of the interviewees said they would choose an EV as their next car, while 26% said they would be transitioning to electric vehicles in the next five years.

Nonetheless, EV buyers are likely to pay more in charging their car batteries unless they analyze the package that comes with EVs. Another study articulates that charging an EV with the public fast-charger is ten times more expensive than charging the car from home. EV owners need to install relevant charging systems in their homes to reduce charging costs.

Slow DC public chargers may be free to use but unfavorable in comparison to home charging. The owner might have to wait for the queue of those charging before he can command. Therefore, it is time-consuming. In 2019, the government instructed that all newly erected homes install an EV charging system. This mode of charging is faster compared to using a household socket.

Various chargers are ranging from 3.6kW units to higher units that charge faster in the shortest time. The essential is selecting an appropriate home charging point from a company validated by the government.

The essential consideration in selecting a government validated home charging installer company. This decision will help the installer to choose the Electric Vehicle Homecharge Scheme (EVHS) permit in the place of the consumer.

After obtaining this grant, the EV owner must choose the quantity of electricity accessible via the wall charger. The lowest charge of 3.6 kW units can charge the EV a bit faster than the home socket. This quantity is excellent for those who cover a short mileage range daily or those with hybrids that charge quickly courtesy of their small battery. The cost of a 3.6kW wallbox lies between £300 and £450, depending on the EVHS grant.

Nonetheless, most of the folks love a 7kW charger that recharges the batteries for double the domestic socket rate. Such chargers cost about £500 to £850 on the implementation of the EVHS grant.

The final choice is a 22kW charger, which is considered the fastest charger in this series. An EV that a 7kW charger replenishes for 14 hours will take this charger nine hours. Choosing a 22kW charger shows that you hope to buy an advanced EV or you have one. However, the challenge is that the domestic electricity supplier may not meet the demands of a 22kW charger. Thus, it is wise to understand if the grid is connected to a three-phase or a single-phase.


Transition to green energy, through renewable and the vanadium redox battery

While the world strengthens its efforts to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic’s devastation, we cannot neglect the urgent need to speed up the switch to renewable. While change begins as we know it, life during even after this, the pandemic has placed greater emphasis on the demand for the planet to be greener. A greener planet is achievable by the installation of efficient bulk energy battery storage.

COVID-19 epidemic has led to a full economic breakdown in several areas. With air traffic coming to a standstill, the motorways factories being closed, we have seen a substantial reduction in carbon emissions from various economic sectors. It gave us a highlight of what the future might look like if effective action works.

As per a report published in the climate and energy publication, by April 2020, daily global carbon dioxide emissions fell by approximately 17percent [1] compared to the mean rates of 2019, a direct consequence of the pandemic’s economic shutdown. As the earth recovers, we will use this crucial juncture to make substantial progress in achieving the transformation to green energy needed.

Although we understand the challenges faced by COVID-19, we could not afford to lose vision of renewable energy opportunities and energy storage technologies, such as Vanadium Redox Flow Battery (VRFB) today. The VRFB is a responsible and sustainable energy storage battery powered by such a vanadium-electrolyte liquid solution that stores and releases a large amount of energy over extended periods. Besides, the VRFB is capable of discharging 100 percent without harm to the battery and provides a safe, continuous power supply to users.

Combined with the use of battery storage, the increasing implementation of renewable sources of energy is crucial elements to accelerate this transition. To further help this, with storage technologies, renewables can minimize carbon emissions by 70 percent by 2050.

In conclusion, at Largo Resources, as the planet concurrently battles the COVID-19 pandemic as well as accelerates the required shift to green energy usage, we recognize our role in helping this change and the clean technology options obtained via vanadium processing. Our high-grade VPURE+ products become necessary to produce the required electrolyte for VRFBs, which is the optimal solution for power storage at the grid level. Our products of vanadium products are extracted from the world’s highest-grade vanadium deposits via low impact operations, meaning the product contains very minimal pollutants.


A Norwegian billionaire is realigning his two oil companies to focus on the renewable industry future

Norwegian billionaire Kjell Inge Rokke is recreating his business structure’s systems in a move to recuperate his oil firms and reinvest in renewable energy.

The billionaire’s Aker ASA investment company intends to amalgamate his two mega oil sector suppliers Aker Solutions ASA and Kvaerner ASA, to form a new two renewable energy base. This presentation of this plan a rise of 37% and 19% for these two firms if the market picks. These two firms were facing a dismissal should the rising demand for renewables topple the economy.

This alteration for the Aker group comes when the country’s oil sector is experiencing a recess due to the novel coronavirus pandemic. The other imperative problem for this industry is the declining need for fossil fuels, especially now that the globe is tackling climate change.

The chief executive of Aker, Oyvind Eriksen, stated that their mission as a firm is to supersede the renewable energy firms by developing technology that counters the techniques of these global industries. This strategy will ensure that they survive the looming transition and rival favorably the upcoming renewable energy industries.

Another strategy of the Aker group is to procure the wind energy producer NBT AS at face value of $333 million to upscale the company’s renewable energy subsystem known as Aker Horizons. Horizons will be chaired by Kristian Rokke, the Aker group CEO’s son, who has proven his leadership skills and qualities by leading in other branches of the Aker group.

The resultant firms from these two companies, Aker Offshore Wind and Aker Carbon Capture, will join the Merkur Market in Oslo and be financed by two private investors. Aker Solutions was already delving into renewables, especially in offshore wind projects. The firm was providing engineering services for these projects and claiming ownership in some projects where it was legal.

The precise balance of amalgamation between Aker Solutions and Kvaerner is unknown, but sources have that the shareholders will receive 43% and 53% percent in the resultant firm.

Aker Solutions intends to elect Kjetel Digre as their chief executive. Kjetel’s appointment is effective beginning August 1st and will be responsible for operations and resource management at Aker BP ASA. The resultant company will reduce its staff from 19000 to 15000 because of the coronavirus pandemic.

Finally, the two companies’ approval to merge and gain an enlisting on Merkel Market awaits the consent of the scheduled shareholder meetings in September. The government, which has about 30% ownership in these companies, said that it supports the merger.


BMW has a series of X1 models and a 5 series that intends to launch into the market beginning next year

BMW revealed that it would be selling out all the X1 compact electric SUV models together with 5 Series. This move by the German car-manufacturing company is in line with the firm’s strategy of deploying 25 electric vehicle models in the coming three years. 

However, BMW was adamant about specifying when the X1 or 5 Series electric models would be deployable for a test-drive. The BMW X1 and BMW 5 Series vehicles will be the first electric models for the BMW fanatics. The firm has announced that it will be releasing plug-in hybrids for its sedan and SUV, which also have the 48-volt mild-hybrid diesel or petrol technology. 

The BMW X1 and the BMW 5 Series models are the newest addition to BMW’s line of electric cars. At the beginning of this year, reiterated that there upcoming 7 series sedan would come with an electrical drive system. 

BMW announced that 12 of its new car models whose launch is in the next three years would be completely electric. This announcement implies that the cars will be either hybrids or plug-in hybrids. By the end of the coming decade, BMW’s plan has to produce over 7 million electric BMW Group vehicles. The auto industry giant hopes that of this production, 67% will have a complete electrical system. 

Currently, the firm is designing five electric vehicles that will feature in the automotive market before 2022. These models include the BMW iX3, the BMW iNEXT, the BMW i3, the BMW i4, and the Mini Cooper SE. One of the models, i3, is famous as a brand in the global EV industry. The other brands are entirely a new fish in the business. Some of the notable features for the Mini Cooper SE is the i3 motor with a mileage range of 110 miles courtesy of its 32.6 kWh battery. The car goes as a luxurious ride in the urban centers. 

The BMW iX3 is an electric version of the X3 and will mark the transition of this brand to an EV while undergoing assemblage in China. The brand will be gracing the Chinese market instead of the United States since the China market and government are supportive of the electric vehicle industry. So far, the brand is making a name for itself in the market. 

In conclusion, the BMW i4 is a four-door Gran Coupe capable of navigating for over 270 miles. The car has a 530 horsepower, and its manufacturing will start in 2021. The iNEXT is the other brand whose production will begin next year before entering the Chinese market. 


Ecology Action Center says that there is a need for incentives to drive more electric vehicle sales

It’s time the Government of Nova Scotia took center stage in placing more autonomous vehicles on the road. The perspective of the Ecology Action Center‘s Kelsey Lane, supported by a 27-page Dunsky Energy Consulting report published for EAC.

Lane, who works with an environmental charity organization as a coordinator for sustainable transportation, said that the research had demonstrated the benefits of getting regional action to promote further supply-side adoption of electric vehicles with demand-sided policies.

The Dunsky and Lane report describe 400 vehicles registered in Nova Scotia that traverse the highways and byways of the province, making up less than one percent of motor traffic. Lane calls for zero-emission vehicle regulations as though they have in Quebec and additional incentives for driving demand and bringing down the cost on cars. The Quebec model is complex and is bound up with a state stipulation that only 3.5% of car sales be electric.

The electric vehicle’s average cost estimated at around $50,000, is expensive compared with the $35,000 for cars with combustion engines. The cost of maintenance for autonomous cars is $485 per annum, relative to $1.200 for combustion vehicles. The energy savings are estimated at $1400 annually, relying on 15,000 kilometers of regular use.

There is a $5,000 government discount on electric cars and a $2,500 discount on hybrid vehicles. Many jurisdictions, notably Quebec and British Columbia, offer $3,000 to $8,000 in annual rebates that raise adoption rates.

Dunsky’s report puts it that time is a factor and also emphasizing that Nova Scotia pledged to decrease its greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by 53% below 2005 rates by 2030 to stay under 1.5 degrees Celsius of warming. The report continues to state that we will continue to miss the mark if we use the business-as-usual approach on autonomous vehicles and that the targets for federal electric cars won’t be achievable.

The market for electric cars won’t move by itself. Provincial government and industry leadership is critical to Nova Scotia’s take-up of electric vehicles, and supply is tied to demand. And people who may be committed to purchasing it may not be able to afford the cars of their desire.

The Dunsky report says the adoption of EV in Nova Scotia to date delays other states across North America, with EVs accounting for less than 1% of the region’s new sales, compared to up to 10% in powerhouse regions.

In conclusion, Lane expressed she’s confident the province will step away from burning fossil fuels such as coal for electricity over the next decade. Nevertheless, autonomous motors in Nova Scotia are about 50% more productive than single-engine internal combustion right now, and this also relies on the specific model. 


The truth about the cost of electric vehicles

Various questions on electric cars revolve primarily on their prices and operation cost. Moderately speaking, EVs are more expensive at a first-hand price but are cheaper when other variables like maintenance factor in the equation. Therefore, the higher the rate, the cheaper the costs of operating it.

The upfront price of an electric car is high but exceedingly cheap when the cost of tax, maintenance, and insurance features in the formula. Nonetheless, there are cheaper EV models that customers can consider instead of the expensive Tesla models.

It is exceptionally cheap to recharge an electric or hybrid car than to refill a gasoline-powered model. Charging an electric vehicle at home is even more inexpensive than fast, loading it in a charging station. Charging an EV overnight at home ensures that the battery has enough time to charge without interference.

Public charging of electric vehicles may be cheaper, depending on this service provider. For instance, the UK has over 20 EV charging network companies whereby some offer the service for free, whereas in others, it is variable. Fast-charging stations are more expensive since they provide these services in a short period.

On the other hand, refilling a hybrid depends on the fuel type of the car. Plug-in hybrids are cheaper to use since their high capacity batteries minimize the fuel need. A hybrid EV may release lower emissions, thereby reducing the tax rates. Hybrids are the best alternatives for undecided customers who are still understanding the efficiency of EVs while at the same time considering the low price of ICE cars.

Electric vehicles have a lifespan of about ten years with a battery warranty of around eight years or 160000 kilometers. Most batteries have the potential of withstanding 1000 full charge cycles before requiring a replacement. With the modification of battery technology, this has been leading to the reduced prices of batteries. It is vital to consider the guarantee period left for a battery before considering buying it as a replacement.

Conventionally, maintaining an electric car is cheap compared to servicing ICE engines. For gasoline-powered vehicles, the owner has to change the oil, lubricate the numerous moving parts, and do many other operations that are not necessary for EVs. The maintenance of the EV is not as tedious as for an ICE car since most activities involved take a short time.

Finally, electric cars are costly in terms of insurance since technology is the primary insurance component. The advanced technology in Evs makes it worthy of having a high insurance fee. Nonetheless, with the growing popularity of Evs implies that their insurance costs will be lower soon.


Modifiable smart windows produce power and enhance energy effectiveness

Windows play numerous functions in our households. The light, cloister as well as circulate air in our spaces while offering views of— as well as security from— the alfresco. Technology-based smart windows or rather windows that make use of cell techs to transform light from the sun into electricity, bring out the extra chances to influence windows as a power source.

Nonetheless, integrating solar cells into windows, whereas balancing the other composite and frequently contradictory functions of windows pieces of evidence difficult. For instance, juggling glow preferences and power harvesting targets throughout varying seasons needs composite and procedural tactics to material layout

Researchers from the American Department of Energy and other parties, in recent times, linked solar cell techs with a novel enhancement tactic to advance a smart window sample that expands layouts transversely an extensive range of standards

The enhancement algorithm makes use of understandable virtual models and developed computational methods to expand general power usage, whereas balancing constructing temperature ultimatums and lightning necessities all over areas and across varying seasons.

Junhong Chen [a scientist at Argonne and the Crown Family Professor of Molecular Engineering] remarked that that layout framework was modifiable and could be applied physically, given any construction around the globe. He added that whether you wished to expand the capacity of light from the sun in a room or reduce heating or cooling attempts, that robust modifiable algorithm generates window layouts that go hand in hand with the operator’s desires and choices.

The researchers displayed an entire method to window layout to expand the general energy efficiency of constructions, whereas bearing in mind the lighting and temperature choices.

Wei Chen [the Wilson-Cook Professor in Engineering Design] as well highlighted that they could control the light from the sun in a room to safeguard the necessitated glow while managing the capacity of energy the constructions utilize for heating as well as cooling. He further added that the sunlight that did not go through was caught by a solar cell in the smart window and transformed into electricity.

The tactic, dubbed multicriteria modifying, regulates thicknesses of solar cell coatings in window layout to certify the desires of the operator. For instance, to decrease the energy necessitated to cool a construction in the summer, the ideal window layout may reduce the capacity and type of illumination passing through while upholding the necessitated glow inside. Looking on the other side, when savings during winter is precedence, the layout may expand the capacity of light that goes through, thus decreasing the energy necessitated for heating and construction.

Wei Chen remarked again that instead of putting their thoughts only the amount power generated by the solar cells, they bear in mind the whole construction’s energy usage to monitor they could best utilize solar energy to reduce it. 


The revival of the 1603 cash-grant for small business people

This week, Illinois Rep. Sean Casten introduced a bill that will revive the 1603 grant program formulated in the year 2009 under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. The 1603 program amounts to about 800 billion US dollars initiative that congress approved the outcome of the significant decline allowed in the renewable energy projects that will receive more than 30 percent of the capital cost of the project in monetary payment. The act made developers free from relying on tax equity markets, which monetize the production and investment tax credits given to renewables. Rep Casten’s bill aims to reinstate the monetary grant program for the ITC and PTC throughout this year up to the end of 2022respectively, for the projects that began 1st Jan 2020. In the program, a wide variety of technology will benefit from the cash grant program, which includes geothermal, biomass, solar, wind, hydropower, and some of the innovative solutions to the production of renewable energy.  

Like what happened in the year 2009, when there was a financial crisis, the ongoing global economic fall has limited the presence of tax equity financing. The financial downfall will do the new project for renewable energy to stagnate. The development of renewable energy is from investors’ perspective when the environment becomes safe and mature to invest in compared to gas and oil. The two ideas will provide a financial fragment for the whole renewable industry because of the coronavirus pandemic. The muscular investors will take advantage of the available access to the tax equity market, and the small investors will be behind.

A large number of tax-equity providers in the United States renewables like JPMorgan, Bank of America is continuing with the financing of renewables programs and projects. Engie, a retail electricity provider in the whole of the United States, said in April that the company had received a 1.6 billion US dollars tax equity package that covered the 2 gigawatts of renewables from two major banks. On the other hand, the sPower who is a utility-scale energy developer said it had 350 million US dollars of tax equity from Wells Fargo to fund a 620 Megawatts solar project in VA. The above is the largest solar project in the east of the Rockies. The reduction in the desire to have tax-equity financing will, on the other hand, affect small businesses in the renewable energy sector and might cause project cancellation.  


The 100 percent electric vehicles Lyft’s plan could cost its riders

Lyft recently initiated a daring effort and became the ride-sharing emissions friendly service. The brave ambition declared in the last week and scheduled to take shape by the year 2030, would need all Lyft cars, whether leased or bought, to become battery electric vehicles (BEV). However, with grand strategies come ruthless realities that could make Lyft’s dream unachievable without charge increases.

Lyft stood its strategy on the dangerous assumptions that cost uniformity of gas-energized and electric cars is attainable by the year 2030. Lyft confirmed that they anticipate the savings to go up in the meantime as the cost of Electric Vehicle battery keeps on coming down. While significant decreases for battery prices may arise as soon as after five years, other electric car costs are there for Lyft to consider. The batteries cooperate 25 percent of an electric car’s production costs, and less understandable parts such as individual motors, software, and electronics cost an additional 10 percent and other extra expenses linked to EV ownership such as vehicle chargers, expensive repairs, higher insurance, high depreciation, and compact vehicle’s life. 

Some of Lyft’s advantage projections were on experience bases of its Express Drive riders, which might have led to logical selection bias. Contestants in these programs ride full-time and are consequently able to distinguish high mileage fee benefits from gas savings that might overshadow the other prices associated with the ownership of the Electric Vehicle. However, there is a probable fault with the surveying approach of Lyft, Express Drive staff do not have vehicle ownership and consequently are not responsible for further costs associated with the property of the Electric Vehicle. For a fact, approximately every Express Drive driver hire vehicles since they are unable to afford to purchase their own. If they do ultimately buy, they go for cars that also provide for their individual needs and tend to buy gasoline-powered cars because they are more sympathetic economically and generally convenient.

Most of Lyft drivers are part-time appearance workers who moonlight their primary vehicle to make extra money. The staff does not drive adequately to cover the additional costs associated with possessing electric cars and tend to make use of the older pre-owned vehicles. The typical age of commercial vehicles on the United States roads is 11.7 years that is about four years young compared to the age requirement of Lyft.